Much like every node on the global supply chain, the North American container seaport sector endured a series of disruptions caused by the pandemic—but it still ended up handling more containers than ever over the course of the past two years.
In fact, U.S.-bound retail container import volumes saw strong spring numbers. For May, the most recent month for which data is available, import volume increased 6% compared to April, and was up 2.7% annually.
What’s more, this tally represents a new monthly import record, going back to when the National Retail Federation (NRF) initially began tracking imports, coming in ahead of the previous record set in March.
And as retailers work to meet ongoing strong demand levels and hedge against potential West Coast port labor disruptions, the NRF doesn’t see volumes slipping any time soon—a period that will be sure to test the limits of the North American port infrastructure.
According to Jonathan Gold, vice president for supply chain and Customs policy at NRF: “Cargo volume is expected to remain high as we head into the peak shipping season, and it’s essential that all ports continue to operate with minimal disruption. Supply chain challenges will continue throughout the remainder of the year, and it’s particularly important that labor and management at West Coast ports remain at the bargaining table and reach an agreement.”
No matter what curve balls are thrown to them next, our readers tell us that it can be sure that the 14 ports taking home Quest for Quality gold in 2022 will be equal to the task. While all the overall weighted scores of the winners were notable across the board, it’s worth noting that the Port of San Diego put up the highest overall score in the category (54.35), with top marks across all the attribute categories out west.
Ease of doing business |
Value | Ocean Carrier network |
Intermodal network |
Equipment & operations |
Weighted score |
|
Massport | 10.85 | 9.71 | 8.45 | 7.93 | 10.06 | 46.99 |
Port Authority of NY & NJ | 8.24 | 9.63 | 9.24 | 8.86 | 9.53 | 45.50 |
AVERAGE | 8.85 | 9.52 | 9.14 | 8.54 | 9.40 | 45.45 |
Source: Logistics Management, Peerless Research Group (PRG)
Ease of doing business |
Value | Ocean Carrier network |
Intermodal network |
Equipment & operations |
Weighted score |
|
PhilaPort (The Port of Philadelphia) | 10.55 | 9.71 | 9.10 | 8.54 | 10.06 | 47.95 |
Port of Baltimore | 10.32 | 9.88 | 8.29 | 6.86 | 9.70 | 45.04 |
AVERAGE | 10.63 | 9.31 | 8.17 | 6.97 | 9.44 | 44.52 |
Source: Logistics Management, Peerless Research Group (PRG)
Ease of doing business |
Value | Ocean Carrier network |
Intermodal network |
Equipment & operations |
Weighted score |
|
Jacksonville Port Authority | 11.39 | 11.56 | 8.67 | 6.86 | 11.01 | 49.49 |
Port of Savannah | 10.90 | 10.59 | 9.57 | 8.42 | 9.48 | 48.96 |
Port of San Juan | 12.66 | 10.40 | 7.80 | 7.32 | 10.78 | 48.96 |
AVERAGE | 10.85 | 10.26 | 8.90 | 7.32 | 9.44 | 46.78 |
Source: Logistics Management, Peerless Research Group (PRG)
Ease of doing business |
Value | Ocean Carrier network |
Intermodal network |
Equipment & operations |
Weighted score |
|
Port of Houston | 10.34 | 10.07 | 10.06 | 7.52 | 10.21 | 48.20 |
AVERAGE | 10.65 | 9.58 | 9.51 | 7.66 | 9.80 | 47.19 |
Source: Logistics Management, Peerless Research Group (PRG)
Ease of doing business |
Value | Ocean Carrier network |
Intermodal network |
Equipment & operations |
Weighted score |
|
Port of Montreal | 9.04 | 9.15 | 10.14 | 8.05 | 11.21 | 47.59 |
AVERAGE | 10.22 | 8.32 | 9.22 | 6.99 | 9.80 | 44.54 |
Source: Logistics Management, Peerless Research Group (PRG)
Ease of doing business |
Value | Ocean Carrier network |
Intermodal network |
Equipment & operations |
Weighted score |
|
Port of San Diego | 11.61 | 11.09 | 10.40 | 9.76 | 11.49 | 54.35 |
Port of Vancouver, Canada | 9.65 | 10.05 | 9.93 | 8.85 | 10.06 | 48.53 |
Port of San Francisco | 10.13 | 9.36 | 8.78 | 8.24 | 10.78 | 47.27 |
Port of Portland | 9.65 | 9.15 | 7.80 | 8.05 | 9.48 | 44.13 |
Port of Oakland | 8.74 | 8.32 | 9.43 | 7.63 | 8.62 | 42.73 |
AVERAGE | 8.09 | 8.03 | 9.35 | 7.58 | 8.20 | 41.25 |
Source: Logistics Management, Peerless Research Group (PRG)